The economist
explains how the conflict between Israel and the Gaza strip is getting worse as
time passes. Both sides have decided to cease fire because many innocent people
have been killed because of the hate and rivalry among them. They are fighting
in order to get their territory back because according to both sides the
territory belongs to them. There are many factors that contribute to this
dispute, like religion, culture and language. The majority of the citizens want
to end this conflict because at any moment their life could be in risk because
that country lacks of security.
The HAMAS are the
Islamic movement that have ruled Gaza since 2007, and the fight in order to get
their territory back and make their rights value. Egypt is the country that is helping Gaza by giving
them weapons in order to defend themselves from the Israelites. I believe that
this conflict will not end until either side gets destroyed or leave the
country. The UN should make a plan of action in order to end this ancient
conflict. Also, the UN should not listen the countries that BETO this decisions
because it is not making any good to that poor country and their citizens.
Photo Credit: The economist
MLA citations:
Israel and the
Palestinians: Old battles, new Middle East | The Economist. (n.d.). Retrieved
from http://www.economist.com/news/21567086-ceasefire-between-israel-and-hamas-could-yet-be-unlikely-foundation-peace-old-battles-new
Hi freddy i like your website and post because you are including images. Who do you think should get the territory?
ResponderEliminarHi freddy, i read an article that is very similar to yours. I agree with your position about the UN. The united states must approve this law in order to end this conflict.
ResponderEliminar